Lindy vs Make
VS
01
The Winner
Too Close to Call
Both Lindy and Make are excellent choices. Your decision should be based on specific feature needs and use case.
Choose Lindy if: Teams wanting AI-powered automation
Choose Make if: Complex visual workflow orchestration
02
Quick Comparison
03
Feature Breakdown
Lindy Key Features
- AI Agent Builder with natural language 'vibe coding' - create agents from simple prompts
- 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream partnership (Gmail, Slack, Notion, HubSpot, Salesforce, Airtable, Quickbooks, and more)
- Agent Swarms - organize multiple AI agents across departments for coordinated workflows
- Gaia AI Phone Agent platform for autonomous voice calls (sales, support, scheduling)
- Multi-model AI support (Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5, GPT-5 Codex, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, OpenAI o3, Claude Haiku 3.5)
- Autopilot feature - AI agents use cloud computers to go beyond API integration limits
- Custom Python/JavaScript code execution within workflows for data manipulation and complex logic
- No-code visual workflow builder with drag-and-drop triggers and actions
- Up to 50M character knowledge base (Business plan) for context-aware agent responses
- Image processing with Gemini - share images with AI agents for intelligent analysis
- SOC 2 & HIPAA compliance, SSO, SCIM provisioning, and audit logs for enterprise security
- 30+ language support for global deployment
- Email triage, calendar management, CRM updates, lead qualification automation
- Real-time collaboration and task delegation across business tools
Make Key Features
- Make AI Agents (beta) - autonomous decision-making agents that adapt workflows in real-time
- Maia AI - natural language scenario builder for creating automations through conversation
- AI Content Extractor - summarize and extract data from PDFs, images, and audio files
- Visual orchestration with drag-and-drop interface for complex workflows
- 2,000+ pre-built app integrations with 30,000+ actions
- Advanced routing and branching with filters and conditional logic
- OpenAI GPT-4o, o3, and Claude AI model integrations with custom provider support
- Transform scenarios into reusable API functions for modular AI agent tools
Lindy
Strengths
- Easiest Agent Builder Available
- 5,000+ Integrations Beat Everyone
- Agent Swarms Are Genuinely Powerful
- Phone AI Is Production-Ready
Limitations
Full Lindy Review →
- Credit-Based Pricing Is Unpredictable
- AI Agents Are Less Reliable Than Traditional Automation
- Workflow Builder Lags Behind Make
Make
Strengths
- Unmatched Visual Control
- AI Agents Transform Automation
- Exceptional Value at Scale
- Maia AI Accelerates Setup
Limitations
Full Make Review →
- Steeper Learning Curve
- AI Agents Still in Beta
- Error Messages Can Be Cryptic
04
Lindy Overview
If you're tired of wrestling with complex automation tools, Lindy is a breath of fresh air. The Pro tier delivers incredible value for small teams automating repetitive work. Agent Swarms and phone AI make this a serious enterprise platform. The free tier (400 credits) lets you genuinely test before committing.
Best For:
- Teams wanting AI-powered automation
- Businesses needing multi-department agent deployment (swarms)
- Organizations requiring 5,000+ integrations via Pipedream
- Teams wanting natural language agent creation
- Companies needing voice AI capabilities (Gaia phone agents)
- Global teams (supports 30+ languages)
- Enterprises requiring advanced security (SSO, SCIM, audit logs)
05
Make Overview
If you've outgrown Zapier's linear flows or need visual control over complex logic, Make is worth the learning curve. The Core tier delivers serious power for the price. Pro unlocks AI Agents and priority execution. Teams is perfect for collaborative automation. Free tier lets you test with 1,000 ops/month.
Best For:
- Complex visual workflow orchestration
- Users who want granular control over data transformation without coding
- Businesses requiring advanced routing, filtering, and conditional logic
- Organizations seeking cost-effective automation at scale
- Teams managing multi-step workflows with numerous app integrations
- Users who prefer drag-and-drop interfaces over linear automation flows
- Companies needing real-time data flow visualization
06
The Verdict
Too Close to Call
Both Lindy and Make are excellent choices for their respective strengths. Lindy is ideal for Teams wanting AI-powered automation, while Make shines at Complex visual workflow orchestration. Your final choice should depend on your specific requirements and budget.
07
Lindy vs Make FAQ
Both Lindy and Make are excellent tools. Lindy is better for Teams wanting AI-powered automation, while Make excels at Complex visual workflow orchestration. Your choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Lindy pricing: Contact sales. Make pricing: Free tier available. Make is more affordable at the entry level, but compare features at each tier to find the best value for your needs.
Yes, many teams use multiple tools for different purposes. Lindy might handle Teams wanting AI-powered automation, while Make covers Complex visual workflow orchestration. Check integration options for both tools.
Both offer robust support. Lindy provides standard support, while Make offers comprehensive support. Enterprise plans typically include dedicated support for both.
Consider switching if Make better fits your current needs. Key factors: Complex visual workflow orchestration, pricing alignment, and team workflow compatibility. We recommend trialing Make before making a full switch.
08